Ed Tech can affect schools in remote areas
download Marley & Me dvd I watched this TED Talks video tonight and found the conclusions interesting. Sugata Mitra’s “Hole in the Wall” experiments went into remote areas of India and researched the effect of Ed Tech and children teaching each other.
His conclusions were:
- The more remote the school, the worse the quality of the schools.
- Education Technology
does much more to improve teaching and learning in schools in remote schools than in more suburban schools. Thus education technology should start in remote schools where it will make the most impact for the investment.
- Values are acquired, not imposed.
- Children can learn each other in groups by watch how others do something and listening to how they did it.
Resurrecting the Champ download I think these conclusions have implications for us ed tech advocates. It validates that education technology itself does impact the quality of a school.
Many times ed tech starts in the least effective places, affluent suburban school districts that can afford to finance the technology themselves, instead of in more remote rural (and inner city?) area. However, that means the money has to come from somewhere besides the school district. Where?
The Ugly psp Finally, kids can learn on their own, especially values. We need to model how to learn, and then get out of their way and let them learn. Sure we can guide and give help to those who need it, but many times we tend to be controlling and dogmatic in our teaching. We need to let them by doing some of their own exploration and learning from each other.
Creative Commons License

Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act passes »« Different Kinds of Reading

Flickr/jsigler
Twitter/jsigler
YouTube/jsigler
Diigo/jsigler
GMail/James Sigler
Blog/James Sigler






![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=3599b136-919e-4270-b899-0d12109eea16)



Lunarpages web hosting