Desert Saints divx David Warlick in his 2¢ Worth blog quoted a recent speaker.
Leaving Barstow hd
I agree with David. The state should deem the minimum of the curriculum, not the maximum. Testing in is an integral part of evaluation of the curriculum and the instructional process. However, the test should not BE the curriculum. The test comes at the end of the lesson, not before the lesson.
I taught dinosaurs in my 3rd grade class a few years ago even though it is not anywhere in my curriculum. I tied it into science with plant and animal relationships: plant eating brachiosaurus, meat eating Allosaurus, and the skeletal structure that tells us what they ate. We talked about climate change: the ice age, possible causes of extinction, and current global warming trends. We even touched on evolution and adaptation. I tied it into Communication Arts when we researched dinosaurs, wrote reports, and drew pictures of them. We looked at time-lines in Social Studies to see just how far back 400,000,000 years is compared to human history. In Math we measured and compared sizes of various dinosaurs.
Don’t tell me Dinosaurs is not part of my curriculum. It is merely the fun theme I used to trick my students into having so much fun learning about dinosaurs that they hardly realized how much of the curriculum that they were learning.
Bat*21 hd
I have another problem with what the speaker said
2¢ Worth
Anything that’s taught that’s not on the test, is doing harm to your children
I contend that the opposite is true. The test is doing harm to our children. Since it only tests the minimum, the curriculum on goes into depth at a minimum. The test is leading the curriculum, instead of the opposite. The curriculum should be leading the test. This “bass-ackwards” approach to curriculum development has resulted in our curriculum being a mile wide the an inch deep. This is nothing new. My education professors were complaining about this problem years ago before I was even a teacher.
The curriculum should be taught deeply, with the student at the center of the learning instead of the test. There should only be a few topics (maybe one per quarter) taught in a subject with several cross-curricular objectives under that topic. We need to teach much deeper, or should I say higher (on Blooms Taxonomy), than the broad shallow treatment we’re giving it because of so much testing. I’ll save NCLB testing for another day.
Powered by ScribeFire.
Next Day Air film
Batman: Gotham Knight download
Two Tigers trailer
Drifter: Henry Lee Lucas release Pavement: Slow Century dvdrip
Digital Dialog Ning »« I finally fixed it!